One engine. 100 ranked decision questions.
Start from the question, not a blank canvas. Every use case ships with an executive brief, a detailed dossier and a recipe that builds the board in one click: the filters, the signature exhibit and the board are set for you.
Built for the specialists who prepare the call.
CI, R&D, BD, market research and strategy teams build their own views on the same engine.
- 1Indication prioritisationHow crowded or open is a therapeutic area before we commit?R&D · Bullseye
- 4Deal timing intelligenceWhen should BD move, given the competitive timeline?BD · Timeline
- 5Unmet-need whitespaceWhere is the burden high and the field still thin?BD · Quadrant map
- 6Approved-product & label landscapeWhat is already approved, and on what label?Marketing · Bullseye
- 8Asset 360 diligenceWho owns the asset, and what do trials, IP and filings show?BD · Ownership tree
- 10Regulatory intelligence monitoringWhat changed in the regulatory landscape for our area?RA · Diff view
Lead views across the 100 use cases span 24 chart types; bullseye and timeline lead 38 of them. Weighted score = 0.30 stakes + 0.25 centrality + 0.15 reach + 0.15 frequency + 0.15 data fit. You can re-weight the ranking for your own priorities.
Three answers a GI team gets today.
ClinicalTrials.gov, pulled 11 September 2026. Re-run the recipe and the answer updates; freeze it and it doesn't.
UC and Crohn's absorb 157 of 169 active GI trials
Crowded: 63 of the 157 IBD trials are already in Phase 3. Thin: celiac disease has five trials and none in Phase 3. An opportunity to qualify against disease burden and terminated trials, not yet white space.
Six of nine active EoE trials reach primary completion in 2026
Plan site activation for H1 2027 and watch the Phase 3 whose completion date has passed with its status unchanged.
Germany pairs deep Crohn's experience with light competition
2.3 competing trials per 10 completed, against 20.0 in China. Shortlist Germany; pair Poland and Spain with enrolment-risk monitoring.
Ten ranked clinical-operations questions, feasibility to capacity.
Each one ships with a brief, a dossier and a recipe that builds the board. The lead view is the best-fit chart for the decision.
Feasibility assessment
Where are similar trials already running?
Experience vs competitionSite selection
Which sites hold established patient pools?
Concentration (Pareto)Recruitment benchmarking
What enrolment rate is realistic?
Distribution vs benchmarkProtocol design benchmarking
Where does our protocol deviate from the field?
Eligibility waterfallCompetitive enrolment risk
Who is recruiting our patients right now?
Diverging bar by regionCountry entry strategy
Where do infrastructure and precedent exist?
Action-zone mapTimeline planning
When do competing trials finish?
TimelineCRO & vendor landscape
Who runs this work in the region?
Concentration (Pareto)Termination risk
Why do trials in our area stop?
Ranked bar by reasonCapacity planning
Which sites are already saturated?
KPI snapshotLandscapes already built, across therapeutic areas.
Every instance comes with worked examples, so your team starts from a finished board rather than an empty one.
Which question would you ask first?
Bring it to a pilot and get the answer on your own programme.